![]() Lightroom might have been worth it, though I hated its way of working when it launches and have no idea if it has improved, but the subscription rules it out. It also does not have basic features like star ratings. Photos should be the obvious options, but though it works offline if you try and view an image, it also gives an error that it cannot find the original every time and I cannot see a way to stop that. So I cannot afford the cost of the high end and subscription options. And I think I only charged whatever it cost to have the print made anyway. I have only ever sold one photo, by accident, in 2007. Unfortunately this rules out a lot of possible applications on cost grounds, because the library management options are inseparable from editing features that make up the majority of the £100+ prices.Īnd while I able to pay a small price, I am not a professional. I do not care about editing features as I can do all that in Affinity Photo. That works best for me for storage, but I want to be able to manage, group, and view them so need a suitable application. The way I have my photos organized is all my raw files go on a partition on an external hard drive in the form: * And it can run on Mojave, as I currently still use that for 32 bit support but it may change soon * On import will create some form of collection based on the folder name, with the photos in subfolders matching the way they are stored on disk ![]() * Will at least cache thumbnails for 'offline' grouping and playing with metadata, better still will cache preview images for review ![]() * Uses a reference library, as my photos are on an external hard disk I want to get back into doing something with my photos so can anyone recommend a photo library management program with the following features: This is going to sound like an Aperture replacement question, but any similarity with an application living or dead is purely coincidental. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |